Discover
Cybersecurity compliance in Iraq has changed significantly in the last 18 months. The Central Bank of Iraq has tightened its security requirements for financial institutions. A comprehensive national cybersecurity law is moving through the legislative process. The Second Iraqi Digital Space Forum in December 2025 put cybersecurity legislation at the top of the government’s agenda. And Iraq’s growing digital infrastructure, including the new National Data Center in Baghdad and expanded fiber networks, has made the question of who protects that infrastructure genuinely urgent.
For businesses operating in Iraq, particularly in banking, government, oil and gas, healthcare, and telecommunications, this is not a future concern. It is a present one. This guide explains what the current requirements are, what is coming, which sectors face the most scrutiny, and what practical steps you should be taking now.
This guide covers regulatory requirements and practical guidance only. It is not legal advice. For formal legal opinions on compliance obligations, consult a qualified lawyer in Iraq.
Iraq does not yet have a single, unified cybersecurity law that applies to all sectors. What it has is a patchwork of sector-specific regulations, international frameworks that regulated entities are expected to align with, and a national cybersecurity strategy that signals the direction of future legislation. Understanding this landscape is the starting point for any compliance effort.
| Regulatory Body / Framework | Sector Covered | Status | Key Focus |
| Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) | Banking and financial services | Active and enforced | Cybersecurity frameworks, incident reporting, access controls, digital payment security |
| Communications and Media Commission (CMC) | Telecommunications and internet service providers | Active with increasing enforcement | Network security, data handling, infrastructure protection |
| National Cybersecurity Strategy (2024-2028) | All sectors, public and private | Policy framework, implementation ongoing | Sets national priorities; expected to underpin future legislation |
| Proposed National Cybersecurity Law | All sectors | Legislative process ongoing as of June 2026 | Mandatory security standards, incident reporting, penalties for breaches |
| Digital Payment Regulation No. 2 (2024) | Any entity processing electronic payments | Active and enforced | Secure transaction processing, fraud prevention, audit requirements |
| Kurdistan Regional Government IT Policy | Public sector in the Kurdistan Region | Active | Digital identity, data protection, e-government security standards |
| ISO 27001 / NIST Framework | Voluntary but increasingly required by government contracts | Referenced in procurement | Information security management system standards |
The most immediate compliance obligations apply to financial institutions under the CBI. But the proposed national cybersecurity law, when enacted, will extend binding requirements to a much broader set of organizations, including energy companies, healthcare providers, and large private-sector businesses.
The CBI has issued several circulars and directives that financial institutions operating in Iraq are required to implement. These cover five main areas:
Banks and financial institutions must have a formal information security policy approved at board level, a designated Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) or equivalent role, and an information security committee that meets regularly. Security is not permitted to be an IT department concern only. It must have executive-level accountability.
The CBI requires strict controls over who can access banking systems and customer data. This includes:
Financial institutions must maintain a defended network perimeter with:
The CBI requires financial institutions to have a documented incident response plan and to report significant cybersecurity incidents to the CBI within defined timeframes. This means organizations need active monitoring in place, not just tools. A security incident that goes undetected for weeks before being reported is a compliance failure in itself.
Under Digital Payment Regulation No. 2 of 2024, all entities processing electronic payments in Iraq must implement secure transaction processing controls, fraud detection systems, and regular audits of payment infrastructure. This applies not just to banks but to any business that has integrated with Iraqi electronic payment platforms.
If your organization is in the financial sector and has not yet conducted a formal gap assessment against CBI requirements, that should be your first step. Osous Al Taqnia works with Iraqi banks and financial institutions on CBI compliance readiness. Get in touch to learn more.
Iraq’s proposed national cybersecurity law, which was a central topic at the Second Iraqi Digital Space Forum in December 2025, is expected to establish the following when enacted:
| Requirement | Who It Affects | What It Means in Practice |
| Mandatory minimum security standards | All critical infrastructure operators and large private-sector businesses | Organizations will need to meet defined technical security baselines, likely aligned with ISO 27001 or NIST |
| Incident reporting obligations | Any organization suffering a significant breach | Breaches must be reported to a national cybersecurity authority within a defined window (likely 72 hours, aligned with international norms) |
| Data localization provisions | Organizations handling sensitive Iraqi citizen or government data | Certain categories of data may be required to be stored on servers physically located within Iraq |
| Third-party and supply chain security | Organizations using cloud providers, IT vendors, or outsourced services | Contracts with third parties must include security requirements; vendors may face audit rights |
| Penalties for non-compliance | All covered organizations | Financial penalties and potential operational sanctions for organizations that fail to meet requirements or fail to report breaches |
| Critical infrastructure designation | Energy, telecoms, finance, water, transport | Designated critical infrastructure operators will face enhanced requirements and government oversight |
The law has not been enacted as of this writing, but the direction is clear and the timeline is accelerating. Organizations that begin aligning with these requirements now will face far less disruption when the law passes than those who wait for it to become enforceable.
Regardless of which specific regulations apply to your sector today, the following controls represent the baseline that any organization in Iraq should have in place. They align with CBI requirements, international frameworks, and the expected direction of national legislation.
A properly configured next-generation firewall is the foundation of network security. In Iraq, where many organizations are still running legacy firewall rules that have not been reviewed in years, this is one of the highest-impact improvements available. Network segmentation, separating finance systems from general office networks and isolating operational technology from IT networks in industrial settings, reduces the blast radius when a breach occurs.
Basic antivirus is no longer adequate. EDR tools such as SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, or Kaspersky Endpoint Security detect and respond to threats that bypass signature-based detection. Every device that connects to your network, including staff laptops, workstations, and servers, should be covered.
MFA is required by the CBI for banking systems and is increasingly expected across sectors. Implementing MFA for email, remote access (VPN), and any cloud application dramatically reduces the risk of credential-based attacks, which are the most common initial access method in Iraqi cybersecurity incidents.
A SIEM system collects log data from across your environment and correlates it to detect suspicious patterns. For organizations subject to the CBI’s incident detection requirements, or those anticipating national cybersecurity law obligations, a SIEM provides both the detection capability and the audit trail needed to demonstrate compliance. This can be deployed in-house or delivered as a managed service through a SOC.
Ransomware is the most prevalent cyber threat facing Iraqi businesses today. The only reliable defense against ransomware in terms of business continuity is a tested, offline or immutable backup. Backups must be tested regularly, not just created. Many organizations in Iraq discover during a recovery attempt that their backup data is corrupt or incomplete.
Controlling who has administrator-level access to your systems, and auditing what they do with it, is a core requirement under CBI guidelines and a critical control under any serious security framework. PAM solutions such as CyberArk or similar tools log, monitor, and control privileged sessions.
Human error remains the leading cause of security breaches in Iraq as it is globally. Regular security awareness training, covering phishing recognition, password hygiene, and social engineering tactics, is a low-cost, high-impact control. The CBI specifically references staff awareness as part of its information security requirements.
Running regular vulnerability scans and annual penetration tests identifies weaknesses before attackers do. The CBI requires penetration testing for financial institutions. For other sectors, it is best practice and increasingly a procurement requirement for government and enterprise contracts.
| Sector | Current Obligations | Immediate Priorities | What’s Coming |
| Banking and finance | CBI cybersecurity circulars, Digital Payment Regulation No. 2 | CISO appointment, MFA, access control audit, penetration test, incident response plan | Enhanced requirements under national cybersecurity law; more frequent CBI inspections |
| Government and public sector | Kurdistan Region IT policy; national e-government security standards | Network segmentation, privileged access controls, secure document management | National cybersecurity law will impose critical infrastructure requirements on ministries and agencies |
| Oil and gas / energy | No sector-specific law yet, but critical infrastructure designation expected | OT/IT network separation, remote site security, SCADA system protection | Critical infrastructure designation under national law; likely most stringent requirements of any sector |
| Healthcare | No specific law yet; international best practice expected | Patient data protection, EHR system access controls, medical device network isolation | Data protection provisions in national cybersecurity law will cover health records |
| Telecommunications | CMC regulations on network security and data handling | Lawful interception compliance, network resilience, subscriber data protection | Enhanced obligations as telecoms are classified as critical infrastructure |
| Retail and e-commerce | Digital Payment Regulation No. 2 for payment processing | POS security, payment system audits, fraud detection | Consumer data protection provisions in national cybersecurity law |
| Education | No specific regulation yet | Network access controls, student data protection, phishing defense | Data localization provisions may affect cloud-based student management systems |
For most organizations in Iraq, the path to cybersecurity compliance follows the same sequence. Here is a practical roadmap:
A mid-sized financial services company in Baghdad reached out to Osous Al Taqnia after receiving a notification from the CBI that they would be subject to a cybersecurity review within 90 days. Their IT team had deployed basic security tools but had no formal documentation, no incident response plan, and no log management in place.
The Osous Al Taqnia team conducted a 5-day gap assessment covering 47 control areas against the CBI framework. The assessment identified 18 critical gaps, including no MFA on core banking system access, firewall rules that had not been reviewed in 26 months, and backups that were stored on the same network segment as production systems, making them vulnerable to the same ransomware that could encrypt production data.
Over the following 10 weeks, the team deployed a Fortinet NGFW with updated threat intelligence feeds, implemented MFA across all banking system access points, migrated backups to an isolated Veeam environment with immutable storage, deployed a SIEM solution for log correlation and alerting, and produced the required policy documentation covering 12 key areas.
The CBI review took place as scheduled. The institution passed with no major findings. More importantly, their actual security posture was genuinely improved, not just documented. They have maintained a managed security monitoring contract with Osous Al Taqnia since.
If your organization is facing a regulatory review or wants to understand its current compliance posture, contact our team for a gap assessment. We work with organizations across banking, government, oil and gas, and healthcare in Baghdad, Erbil, and Basra.
| Mistake | Why It Happens | The Consequence |
| Treating compliance as a documentation exercise | Easier to write a policy than to change a system | Passes initial audit; fails when a real incident occurs or a deeper audit is conducted |
| Implementing tools without configuring them properly | Buying a SIEM or firewall and leaving default settings | Creates a false sense of security; tools do not perform their function |
| No tested incident response plan | Plans are written but never exercised | When a breach occurs, the response is chaotic and slow, making the damage worse |
| Backup not tested | Backups appear to complete successfully in logs | Recovery fails when needed; data is corrupt or missing |
| MFA was deployed only for some users | Senior staff or executives sometimes exempt themselves | Attackers target the highest-privilege accounts first; executive email compromise is common |
| Third-party vendor access not controlled | IT vendors have persistent, unmonitored access to systems | Third-party breaches are one of the most common attack vectors in Iraq |
| No staff training | Budget or time constraints | Phishing remains the most common initial access method; untrained staff are the biggest vulnerability |
Cybersecurity compliance in Iraq is becoming more demanding, not less. The CBI is actively reviewing financial institutions. The national cybersecurity law will extend obligations to a much wider set of organizations. And the threat landscape, ransomware, business email compromise, supply chain attacks, continues to intensify.
The organizations that handle this well are not necessarily the ones with the largest IT budgets. They are the ones that started early, built compliance into their operations rather than treating it as a one-time project, and worked with partners who understood both the technical requirements and the Iraqi regulatory context.
A gap assessment is the right starting point for almost every organization. It tells you where you are, what is required, and what to prioritize. Everything else follows from there.
Osous Al Taqnia provides cybersecurity compliance assessments, gap analysis against CBI and international frameworks, and end-to-end implementation of required security controls for organizations across Iraq. Talk to our team today to understand your current compliance posture and what it would take to get audit-ready.
Currently, mandatory compliance requirements apply primarily to financial institutions under CBI regulations and to entities processing electronic payments under Digital Payment Regulation No. 2 of 2024. Telecommunications companies have obligations under CMC regulations. The proposed national cybersecurity law, when enacted, will extend binding requirements to critical infrastructure operators and likely to a broader range of private-sector businesses. Even where not yet legally required, compliance with international frameworks such as ISO 27001 is increasingly expected in government procurement and enterprise contracts.
The CBI has the authority to issue corrective action notices requiring remediation within defined timeframes, impose financial penalties, restrict certain banking activities, and in serious cases escalate to regulatory sanctions. In practice, the CBI has been focused on getting institutions to a baseline standard rather than punitive action, but the emphasis is shifting toward stricter enforcement as the regulatory framework matures.
ISO 27001 certification demonstrates a mature information security management system and is viewed favorably by the CBI. However, it does not automatically satisfy all CBI-specific requirements, which include some controls that go beyond the ISO 27001 standard. The most effective approach is to use ISO 27001 as the framework for your security program and then map CBI-specific requirements on top of it.
For a medium-sized organization starting from a basic security posture, achieving compliance with CBI requirements typically takes 3 to 6 months of focused effort. This includes gap assessment, policy documentation, technical implementation, staff training, and validation testing. Organizations with more complex environments or more significant gaps may need longer. The process is faster and more effective when managed by an experienced partner who knows both the regulatory requirements and the technical implementation.
A Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system collects and correlates log data from across your IT environment to detect suspicious activity, support incident investigation, and produce audit trails. For financial institutions, the CBI’s incident detection requirements effectively make a SIEM or equivalent capability mandatory. For other sectors, it is best practice for any organization with more than 50 users or that handles sensitive data. It can be deployed as software you manage internally or delivered as a managed service through a Security Operations Center (SOC).
6th Floor, The Meydan Hotel, Nad Al Sheba, Dubai
Villa S 11/5, Atconz, Erbil
62nd St, Baghdad
